ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Cancer prognosis information-seeking among survivors and caregivers: findings from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preguntas Sobre Cáncer (Questions About Cancer): Analysis of Spanish Inquiries to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- The National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service: 50 years of service to the nation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeReceiving prognostic information is a well-documented need for cancer survivors and caregivers. However, little is known about these two groups' prognosis information-seeking outside of discussions with healthcare providers. This study examined survivors' and caregivers' prognosis-related inquiries using data from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service (CIS).
methodsUsing an analytic sample of 81,154 survivors and caregivers, descriptive statistics explored differences between prognosis and non-prognosis inquiries made by each group over a 6-year period (September 2018-August 2024). Logistic regressions identified factors that were associated with odds of a prognosis inquiry among both cancer survivors and caregivers.
resultsA higher proportion of caregivers (62%) made prognosis inquiries to the CIS compared to survivors (38%). Among both groups, telephone and instant chat were commonly used to contact the CIS with prognosis questions. Prognosis inquiries were more likely among survivors and caregivers who contacted the CIS in Spanish and whose inquiries centered on staging, post-treatment, or end-of-life phases of the cancer continuum. For both groups, prognosis inquiries were more likely to occur in the context of discussions about chemotherapy and general questions about cancer treatment. Discussion of prognosis as related to specific cancer sites was variable across survivors and caregivers.
conclusionFindings may inform the development and targeting of messages to support cancer prognosis information-seeking among survivors and caregivers. Disseminating accessible, language-concordant prognostic information that accounts for survivors' and caregivers' respective information-seeking needs is merited. Efforts may contribute to enhancing prognostic understanding, supporting discussions with providers, and improving psychosocial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.