ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2024
Microfluidic impedance flow cytometer leveraging virtual constriction microchannel and its application in leukocyte differential.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cell-Based Immuno-Biosensors Using Microfluidics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Inferring bacterial cell size dynamics across media conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Impedance Detection: Principle, Design and Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic impedance flow cytometry has been widely used in leukocyte differential and counting, but it faces a bottleneck due to the trade-off between impedance detection throughput and sensitivity. In this study, a microfluidic impedance flow cytometer based on a virtual constriction microchannel was reported, in which the virtual constriction microchannel was constructed by crossflow of conductive sample and insulated sheath fluids with underneath micro-electrodes for impedance measurements. Compared to conventional mechanical constriction microchannels, this virtual counterpart could effectively avoid direct physical contact between cells and the microchannel walls to maintain high throughputs, and significantly reduce the volume of the impedance detection region for sensitivity improvements. Using the developed microfluidic impedance flow cytometer, impedance pulses of three leukemia cell lines, K562, Jurkat, and HL-60, were detected, achieving a 99.8% differentiation accuracy through the use of a recurrent neural network. Furthermore, impedance pulses of four white blood cell subpopulations (neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes) from three donors were detected, achieving a classification accuracy of ≥99.2%. A classification network model was established based on purified white blood cell and applied to impedance pulses of two white blood cell mixtures, resulting in proportional distributions of four leukocyte subpopulations within theoretical ranges. These results indicated that the developed microfluidic impedance flow cytometer based on the virtual constriction microchannel could achieve both high detection throughput and high sensitivity, showing great potentials for clinical diagnostics and blood analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.