ReviewNature protocols2025
Precise kilobase-scale genomic insertions in mammalian cells using PASTE.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large serine recombinase-mediated gene insertion for high-throughput screens: advantages, design principles, and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- CRISPR Gene Tagging for Illuminating Endogenous Protein Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- PE-STAR: prime editing with SOS-triggered and RecJ-augmented repair enables high-efficiency editing in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Gene-sized editing for the therapy of genetic diseases.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Integration of large genetic payloads using prime editing and site-specific integrases.Nature protocols · 2025Article
- Rewriting the script: gene therapy and genome editing for von Willebrand Disease.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Programmable gene integration technologies are an emerging modality with exciting applications in both basic research and therapeutic development. Programmable addition via site-specific targeting elements (PASTE) is a programmable gene integration approach for precise and efficient programmable integration of large DNA sequences into the genome. PASTE offers improved editing efficiency, purity and programmability compared with previous methods for long insertions into the mammalian genome. By combining the specificity and cargo size capabilities of site-specific integrases with the programmability of prime editing, PASTE can precisely insert cargoes of at least 36 kb with efficiencies of up to 60%. Here we outline best practices for design, execution and analysis of PASTE experiments, with protocols for integration of EGFP at the human NOLC1 and ACTB genomic loci and for readout by next generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR. We provide guidelines for designing and optimizing a custom PASTE experiment for integration of desired payloads at alternative genomic loci, as well as example applications for in-frame protein tagging and multiplexed insertions. To facilitate experimental setup, we include the necessary sequences and plasmids for the delivery of PASTE components to cells via plasmid transfection or in vitro transcribed RNA. Most experiments in this protocol can be performed in as little as 2 weeks, allowing for precise and versatile programmable gene insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.