Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676072›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2025

Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adjunctive to Surgical Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Retrospective Study.

Ausra Ramanauskaite, Ioanna Saltzer, Ninad Padhye, Amira Begic, Karina Obreja, Iulia Dahmer, Frank Schwarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ausra RamanauskaiteDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ioanna SaltzerDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ninad PadhyeDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Amira BegicDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Karina ObrejaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-0020
Iulia DahmerDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frank SchwarzDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5873-9903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of oral systemic antibiotic prophylaxis administered along with the surgical reconstructive peri-implantitis treatment.

methodsA total of 49 patients exhibiting 70 implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis underwent a surgical reconstructive peri-implantitis treatment. Of them, 27 patients (38 implants) received a single preoperative shot of antibiotics (2 g amoxicillin; Pre-op), 12 patients (19 implants) were prescribed with postoperative antibiotics for 3 days (500 mg amoxicillin, 3 x day, Post-op), and the remaining 10 patients (13 implants) did not receive any systemic antibiotics (No-Ab). Mean probing depth values (mean PDs; primary outcome), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque (PI), suppuration (Sup), and deepest PDs values (max PD) were assessed prior to surgery (baseline), after 6 and 12 months. To assess the differences in changes in the clinical parameters, and disease resolution (PD ≤ 5 mm, ≤ 1 BOP site and no Sup) among the groups, logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsAfter 12 months, the mean PD reduction amounted to -1.74 ± 1.56 mm, -1.91 ± 1.88 mm, and -1.13 ± 1.05 mm in the No-Ab, Pre-op, and Post-op groups, respectively, with no significant difference detected among the groups. The BOP was reduced in 60%, 59.3%, and 83.3% of the patients after 12 months in the No-Ab, Pre-op, and Post-op groups, respectively, with no significant differences among them. The PI, Sup and max PD reductions were comparable among the groups. Disease resolution after 12 months was established in 61.5%, 73.7%, and 89.5% of patients in the No-Ab, Pre-op, and Post-op groups (No-Ab vs. Pre-op: p = 0.10, No-Ab vs. Post-op: p = 0.40, Pre-op vs. Post-op: p = 0.84).

conclusionSystemic antibiotic prophylaxis did not improve the clinical outcomes of surgical reconstructive peri-implantitis treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisPeri-ImplantitisAdultAgedAmoxicillinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsdental implantssurgical reconstructive peri‐implantitis treatmentsystemic antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID39676072
PMCPMC11798903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.