Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39675832›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Assessment of a colposcopic scoring system (Swedescore) to reduce the number of cervical biopsies: a protocol for a clinical multicentre non-randomised intervention study in Denmark.

Ane-Kersti Skaarup Knudsen, Tina Hovgaard Randrup, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Berit Booth, Line Gustafson, Ameli Tropé, Björn Strander, Pekka Nieminen, Anne Hammer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05870787 (iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05870787 completednot on this map

iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2023 to 2024Enrolled929ConditionsCervical Dysplasia, Cervical Disease, Cervical Lesion, Cervical CancerArmsSwede score colposcopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ane-Kersti Skaarup KnudsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-5968
Tina Hovgaard RandrupDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning 7400, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-2557
Ulrik Schiøler KesmodelDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark.
Berit BoothThe Research Unit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, The Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Line GustafsonDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Ameli TropéSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Björn StranderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-7955
Pekka NieminenHelsinki University, Finland, Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne HammerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark ahlauridsen@clin.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColposcopy is a standard procedure for evaluating cervical abnormalities and collecting cervical biopsies. The procedure is associated with intra- and inter-observer variation. A colposcopic scoring system, Swedescore, has been designed to standardise and facilitate colposcopy training. Swedescore has performed well in a routine clinical setting when used by expert colposcopists to find or exclude high-grade lesions. Danish clinical guidelines for colposcopy differ from other countries, as they recommend collecting four cervical biopsies in all women regardless of risk factors or colposcopy findings. Swedescore has never been examined to assess the reduction of cervical biopsies in a real-world clinical setting. This study aims to investigate whether the implementation of Swedescore can optimise the diagnostic work-up for whom the collection of biopsies can be safely omitted or reduced. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design is a clinical multicentre non-randomised intervention study in Denmark. According to a power calculation, we will need to include 586 women referred for colposcopy. Colposcopy with Swedescore will be compared with conventional colposcopy with no Swedescore. Cervical biopsies will be divided into two separate vials (target and random biopsies). The primary outcome will be normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 detected in cervical biopsies. χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been submitted to the Ethical Committee in Central Denmark region and is not notifiable to the Committee (j.no.: 1-10-72-124-22). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05870787. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 3 (date 12. November 2024).

Indexed as

Cervix UteriColposcopyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyDenmarkFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicUterine Cervical DysplasiaBiopsyColposcopyGynaecological oncology

Identifiers

PMID39675832
PMCPMC11647325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.