ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
A novel load-sensing sliding hip screw to aid in the assessment of intertrochanteric fracture healing.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone healing after sliding hip screw internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures is difficult to monitor with radiography. In this study, we describe and evaluate a device to non-invasively determine the loading on the screw implant as a possible qualitative indicator of bone healing. A novel load-sensing sliding hip screw (LS-SHS) was fabricated containing a radio-dense tungsten indicator rod that moves and can be measured within the screw cannulation when the screw bends under load via plain radiography. Screw bending was assessed in intact femurs and unstable A1 intertrochanteric fractures using experimental axial loading of femoral composite Sawbones® and femoral human cadaveric specimens. Sensor readings were visually tracked using plain radiographs at each load state. The sensor exhibited linear response to implant strain in the unstable fracture indicating that the implant supported the major component of the applied load. This was consistently measurable using radiography throughout loading cycles across the mechanical and cadaveric fracture models. Sensor readings indicated that the implant was mostly unloaded in the intact models. The slope of the curve was approximately equal in the composite and cadaveric models (1.0 µm/N and 0.08 µm/N, respectively). Sensor noise levels were sufficient to detect 10% of the applied load of 80 kg, which has the potential to qualitatively assist clinicians in tracking fracture healing progression. Clinicians must carefully monitor their patients for signs of SHS implant failure after surgery. This device quantitively measures implant loading which could qualitatively assist clinicians in the assessment of fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.