ArticlePatient education and counseling2025
Clinical trial knowledge, discussion, and participation among cancer survivors: A HINTS-SEER study.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge of Clinical Trials Among US Cancer Survivors: Cross-Sectional Study of HINTS-SEER Data.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClinical trial knowledge and discussions about clinical trials with healthcare providers contribute to clinical trial participation and clinical trial representation. This study explored 1) the association of patient-provider communication with clinical trial knowledge, 2) how patient-provider communication impacts the associations of demographic and clinical factors with clinical trial knowledge, and 3) motivations for clinical trial participation among people with a history of cancer.
methodsCross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Information National Trends Survey-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (HINTS-SEER) study included 1201 adult cancer survivors recruited from three SEER registries. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with clinical trial knowledge (none, a little bit/a lot) with and without the inclusion of clinical trial discussion with a healthcare provider (yes, no).
resultsApproximately three-quarters of cancer survivors reported having at least "a little" knowledge about clinical trials, though only 15 % reported having discussed clinical trials with their provider. Those who reported patient-provider communication about clinical trials had 8.71 times higher odds of having some clinical trial knowledge. In multivariable logistic regression, odds of knowing at least a little bit about clinical trials were lower among adults without a college degree and among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Asian (versus Non-Hispanic White) adults. Associations of demographic factors with clinical trial knowledge were not impacted by the inclusion of patient-provider discussion in the model. Top motivations for clinical trial participation were helping other people, new treatment, and getting better. CONCLUSION/PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to ensure information about clinical trials is provided to all people with cancer and to facilitate high quality communication between patients and providers about clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.