Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39675060›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2025

Co-developing sleep-wake and sensory foundations for cognition in the human fetus and newborn.

Kimberley Whitehead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kimberley WhiteheadResearch Division of Digital Health and Applied Technology Assessment (DHATA), Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Rd, London SE1 8WA, UK. Electronic address: kimberley.whitehead@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Brain Research UK MR/L019248/1Medical Research Council MR/L019248/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In older children and adults, cognition builds upon waking sensory experience which is consolidated during sleep. In the fetus and newborn, sensory input is instead largely experienced during sleep. The nature of these sensory inputs differs within sleep, between active and quiet sleep, as well as versus wakefulness. Here, sleep-wake organisation in the fetus and newborn is reviewed, and then its interaction with sensory inputs discussed with a focus on somatosensory and auditory modalities. Next, these ideas are applied to how neurological insults affect early development, using fetal growth restriction as a test case. Finally, the argument is made that taking account of sleep-wake state during perinatal functional neuroimaging can better index sensorimotor, language, and cognitive brain activities, potentially improving its diagnostic and prognostic value. To sum up, sensory and sleep-wake functions go hand in hand during early human development. Perturbation of these twinned functions by neurological insults may mediate later neurodevelopmental deficits. Perinatal neuroimaging has the potential to track these trajectories, feasibly identifying opportunities to therapeutically intervene.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionFetusSleepWakefulnessHumansInfant, NewbornBehaviourInfantIntrauterine growth restrictionMotorNeonate

Identifiers

PMID39675060
PMCPMC11699341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.