ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Performance of respiratory gated 4D flow MRI with adaptive k-space reordering in healthy controls and aortic dissection: reproducibility and agreement with 2D phase contrast MRI.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequence with respiratory-controlled adaptive k-space reordering (ReCAR-4DPC) offers potential benefits of improved scan efficiency and motion robustness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of flow measurement using this technique and to compare hemodynamic metrics obtained to two-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2DPC)-derived metrics of the thoracic aorta. ReCAR-4DPC was performed with identical scan parameters in 15 healthy volunteers (6M,9F, mean [range] 37 [23-47] years) and 11 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (6M,5F, 56 [31-81] years) and acquisition time was recorded. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), average flow (AF) and net forward volume (NFV) were quantified by two readers for ReCAR-4DPC at ascending, descending and diaphragmatic aorta levels. Reference standard 2DPC measurements at the same levels were performed by a separate experienced cardiovascular radiologist. ReCAR-4DPC intra-reader agreement, inter-reader agreement, inter-scan repeatability and concordance with 2DPC-derived metrics (all segments combined) were evaluated with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) and reduced major axis regression. The overall average ± SD MRI acquisition time of all subjects was 11:59 ± 3:57 min, with shorter average times (9:37 ± 1:57 min) in healthy volunteers compared to patients (15:13 ± 3:44 min). There was near-perfect intra-reader, inter-reader and inter-scan concordance (LCCC for all metrics > 0.97, > 0.98 and > 0.92 respectively) for ReCAR-4DPC. Concordance with 2DPC was also high (LCCC all > 0.89), with overall minimally lower PSV, AF and NFV values derived from ReCAR-4DPC compared to reference 2DPC derived metrics. ReCAR-4DPC is a reproducible and relatively fast approach for comprehensive measurement of thoracic aortic flow metrics, with robust correlation to conventional 2DPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39674984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.