ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Diagnostic Challenges in Malignant Hyperthermia and Anesthesia-Induced Rhabdomyolysis: A Case Study.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal anesthesia for urgent cesarean section in a parturient with RYR1 mutation-associated malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: a case report.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant hyperthermia (MH) and anesthesia-induced rhabdomyolysis (AIR) are rare, yet life-threatening complications that need prompt therapeutic actions and logistic preparedness for treatment success. Both conditions are triggered by general anesthetics, particularly volatiles and depolarizing muscle relaxants. In comparison with MH, which is an inherited pharmacogenomic disease of calcium channel receptor subpopulation and arises only after trigger exposure, AIR has been described mostly in patients with muscular dystrophies. In perioperative settings, rhabdomyolysis is also observed during propofol infusion syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and cocaine, heroin, and alcohol intoxication. Despite their diverse etiology, the main clinical manifestations of MH and AIR overlap: a hypermetabolic state, hyperpyrexia, hypercarbia, acute renal failure, and hyperkalemia progressing to cardiac arrest, making the therapeutic approach to the patient extremely difficult. CASE REPORT We present an unenviable and challenging clinical scenario of an obligatory general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in a patient with difficult airways for breast conserving onco-surgery with simultaneous targeted intraoperative 20 Gy irradiation. The case was complicated even further by coincident suspicious clinical presentation of a mild and self-limited hypercarbia, together with a protracted rhabdomyolysis, without hyperpyrexia. Given the atypical and scarce clinical presentation leading to diagnosis uncertainty of MH or AIR, which was proved only after receiving the genetic results, dantrolene was not administered, and the patient underwent successful supportive treatment. CONCLUSIONS The study points to the diagnostic dilemma - crisis event MH or AIR - and raises issues about possible preoperative preventive measures and treatment options in patients with an uncertain diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.