ReviewBone marrow transplantation2025
Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for primary and secondary CNS lymphomas.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Design, preclinical evaluation, and multicenter phase 1 clinical study of HZ-A-018 for relapsed or refractory central nervous system lymphoma.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Statistical Methods for Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cell Therapy Outcomes: A Review and Practical Considerations.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Review
- A multidimensional workflow profiling of allogeneic virus-specific T cell therapies reveals potency-linked signatures.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system lymphomas (CNSL) are a heterogeneous group of generally aggressive tumors whose prognosis varies significantly, being more favorable in patients with primary disease and poorer in those with secondary lymphoma. Current treatments typically involve intensive chemotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation or whole-brain radiotherapy. However, if the disease relapses, there is no established standard of care. The recent approval of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for systemic B-cell lymphomas has shifted the treatment landscape for previously incurable patients. Even though this therapy was initially underexplored in the setting of CNSL due to safety and efficacy concerns, it could offer a new therapeutic avenue for these patients. In this review, we will provide a concise overview of the current treatment strategies for CNSL, highlighting their key limitations, including relapse rates and long-term toxicity. Following this, we will explore the most important studies and clinical trials on CNSL, focusing on recent advancements in anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. This comprehensive analysis will offer insights into the successes and challenges of treating CNSL effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39674850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.