ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for myositis and fasciitis, including necrotizing fasciitis, in pediatric patients.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo demonstrate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings in pediatric patients with suspected myositis and fasciitis. We compared sonographic findings between patients with and without necrotizing fasciitis.
methodsIn 21 pediatric patients, the presence or absence of abnormal T2-high signal intensity in subcutaneous fat, peripheral deep fascia, intermuscular fascia, and muscle was recorded. The extent of the disease based on ultrasound findings was recorded according to the previous locations. The vascular lumen within the affected muscle was also evaluated. Patients were classified into two groups: those with necrotizing fasciitis and those without. The presence/absence of sonographic findings and width of fluid accumulation in the peripheral deep fascia was compared between the two groups.
resultsThree patients were classified into the necrotizing fasciitis group. The ultrasound diagnostic performance for abnormal findings in subcutaneous fat/peripheral deep fascia/ intermuscular fascia/muscle was 90.5%/76.2%/47.6%/90.5%, respectively. The presence/absence of abnormal findings in peripheral deep fascial edema, its width and vascular lumen collapse were significantly different between the two groups. The other findings were not significantly different between the groups.
conclusionsUltrasound demonstrated reliability in detecting abnormal findings and was useful for diagnosing necrotizing fasciitis, facilitating urgent surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.