ArticleUrology2025
The Outcomes of Onco-Testis Sperm Extraction at the Time of Radical Orchiectomy.
Article in Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Before Orchiectomy: Gonadal Function in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Microsurgical Onco-Testicular Sperm Extraction in a Patient With Testicular Cancer and Congenital Unilateral Testicular Absence: A Case Report.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate outcomes of onco-testis sperm extraction (TESE) and to define potential predictors of successful surgical sperm retrieval (SSR).
methodsFor this study, we examined all men (i) diagnosed with a testicular mass, (ii) who had azoospermia, and (iii) who underwent a radical orchiectomy and onco-TESE. Our institutional database of testicular cancer (TCA) patients was reviewed. Demographics, baseline endocrine and oncological characteristics, and treatments received were recorded. The onco-TESE Technique was performed at the time of radical orchiectomy before the specimen was sent for formal histopathological assessment. Onco-TESE was considered successful if viable sperm was found. Logistic regression assessments were performed to evaluate predictors of successful onco-TESE.
resultsThirty-eight men with a median age of 35 were included in the analysis. Median baseline total testosterone, LH, and FSH levels were 419ng/dL, 10.9mU/mL, and 27mU/mL, respectively. The median pre-TESE testicular volume was 11 mL. Of men who underwent radical orchiectomy, 58% had unilateral tumors at the time of the procedure. 42% had bilateral tumors, which were synchronous in 25%, and asynchronous tumors in 75%. Pathologically, 76% had germ cell tumor (83% had pure seminoma, and 17% had mixed germ cell tumor). At onco-TESE, 24% of the patients had successful SSR. No variables had a statistically significant association with successful SSR.
conclusionOnco-TESE represents a useful option for testis cancer patients who wish for future paternity, with a quarter of such patients having sperm found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.