ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2024
Estimating the effect of annual PM
Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long Term Exposure to Ambient Particulate MatterKidney international reports · 2026Article
- Changes of Long-Term Exposure to Ultrafine Particles From 2010 to 2019 in High Income Countries in Relation to Cardiovascular Diseases.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- Association between PMArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Air Pollution Within the Public Health Exposome Framework: Impacts on Cardiovascular Health.Current epidemiology reports · 2026Review
- Air pollution interventions for health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular risk factors and life expectancy in India: A retrospective study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Temporal trends of particulate matter pollution and its health burden, 1990-2021, with projections to 2036: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2019, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study attributed 0·98 million deaths to ambient air pollution in India based on potentially inappropriate exposure-response functions from countries with low air pollution levels. Instead, using data from India, we investigated long-term exposure to PM
methodsWe collected national counts of annual mortality from 2009 to 2019 from the Civil Registration System at the district level to calculate annual district-level mortality rate as our main outcome and obtained annual PM
findingsThe annual median population-weighted PM
interpretationOur difference-in-differences approach allowed us to assess the full extent of registered deaths in the most populated country in the world, which has high levels of air pollution. We provide new evidence of increased mortality risk from long-term PM
fundingSwedish Research Council for Sustainable Development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.