ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
Fast intraoperative detection of primary central nervous system lymphoma and differentiation from common central nervous system tumors using stimulated Raman histology and deep learning.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Illuminating glioma surgery: A meta-analysis of Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative decision-making.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Raman Spectroscopy in Cancer Diagnostics and Surgery: 25 Years of Progress from Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Artificial Intelligence─A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- MRI Deep Learning for Differentiating Glioblastoma, IDH Wild-type from Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- AI-driven label-free Raman spectromics for intraoperative spinal tumor assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Based Methods in Neuropathology for Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Tumors.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in brain tumor diagnosis and surgical planning: Recent advances.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-aware ensemble of foundation models differentiates glioblastoma from its mimics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Second harmonic generation for brain imaging: pathology-related studies.Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
- When machines start examining tissue specimens on their own.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in molecular prognostication and treatments in ependymoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Intraoperative classification of CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma by AI-based analysis of Stimulated Raman Histology (SRH).Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Intelligent histology for tumor neurosurgery.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate intraoperative diagnosis is crucial for differentiating between primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) and other CNS entities, guiding surgical decision-making, but represents significant challenges due to overlapping histomorphological features, time constraints, and differing treatment strategies. We combined stimulated Raman histology (SRH) with deep learning to address this challenge.
methodsWe imaged unprocessed, label-free tissue samples intraoperatively using a portable Raman scattering microscope, generating virtual H&E-like images within <3 min. We developed a deep learning pipeline called RapidLymphoma based on a self-supervised learning strategy to (1) detect PCNSL, (2) differentiate from other CNS entities, and (3) test the diagnostic performance in a prospective international multicenter cohort and 2 additional independent test cohorts. We trained on 54 000 SRH patch images sourced from surgical resections and stereotactic-guided biopsies, including various CNS neoplastic/nonneoplastic lesions. Training and test data were collected from 4 tertiary international medical centers. The final histopathological diagnosis served as ground truth.
resultsIn the prospective test cohort of PCNSL and non-PCNSL entities (n = 160), RapidLymphoma achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 97.81% ± 0.91, non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting PCNSL (100% vs. 77.77%). The additional test cohorts (n = 420, n = 59) reached balanced accuracy rates of 95.44% ± 0.74 and 95.57% ± 2.47 in differentiating IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas and various brain metastasis from PCNSL. Visual heatmaps revealed RapidLymphoma's capabilities to detect class-specific histomorphological key features.
conclusionsRapidLymphoma proves reliable and valid for intraoperative PCNSL detection and differentiation from other CNS entities. It provides visual feedback within 3 min, enabling fast clinical decision-making and subsequent treatment strategy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.