Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673726›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2025

The modeling of human implantation and early placentation: achievements and perspectives.

Tanya Dimova, Marina Alexandrova, Ivaylo Vangelov, Yuan You, Gil Mor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanya DimovaInstitute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction "Acad. Kiril Bratanov", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8665-4352
Marina AlexandrovaInstitute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction "Acad. Kiril Bratanov", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ivaylo VangelovInstitute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction "Acad. Kiril Bratanov", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Yuan YouC.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Gil MorC.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

Research Experience & Training Coordination CoreP42ES030991 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Glen Ray Hood · 2022 to 2026
$13.9M
Sex-dimorphic Placental Adaptation to Benzene Exposure: Implications for Fetal and Postnatal Immunological DevelopmentU54ES038382 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Steven James Korzeniewski · 2026 to 2026
$3.0M
Mechanisms of trophoblast-induced immune modulationR01AI145829 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOR, GIL G · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Impact of benzene-induced MIA on fetal T cell developmentR01HD111146 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOR, GIL G · 2023 to 2025
$1.1M
Bulgarian National ScienceBulgarian National Science FundNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145829NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111146NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES030991NIEHS NIH HHS U54 ES038382VIHREN KP-06-DV3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful implantation is a critical step for embryo survival. The major losses in natural and assisted human reproduction appeared to occur during the peri-implantation period. Because of ethical constraints, the fascinating maternal-fetal crosstalk during human implantation is difficult to study and thus, the possibility for clinical intervention is still limited. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This review highlights some features of human implantation as a unique, ineffective and difficult-to-model process and summarizes the pros and cons of the most used in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro models. We point out the variety of cell line-derived models and how these data are corroborated by well-defined primary cells of the same nature. Important aspects related to the handling, standardization, validation, and modus operandi of the advanced 3D in vitro models are widely discussed. Special attention is paid to blastocyst-like models recapitulating the hybrid phenotype and HLA profile of extravillous trophoblasts, which are a unique yet poorly understood population with a major role in the successful implantation and immune mother-embryo recognition. Despite raising new ethical dilemmas, extended embryo cultures and synthetic embryo models are also in the scope of our review. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the electronic database PubMed from inception until March 2024 by using a multi-stage search strategy of MeSH terms and keywords. In addition, we conducted a forward and backward reference search of authors mentioned in selected articles. OUTCOMES: Primates and rodents are valuable in vivo models for human implantation research. However, the deep interstitial, glandular, and endovascular invasion accompanied by a range of human-specific factors responsible for the survival of the fetus determines the uniqueness of the human implantation and limits the cross-species extrapolation of the data. The ex vivo models are short-term cultures, not relevant to the period of implantation, and difficult to standardize. Moreover, the access to tissues from elective terminations of pregnancy raises ethical and legal concerns. Easy-to-culture cancer cell lines have many limitations such as being prone to spontaneous transformation and lacking decent tissue characteristics. The replacement of the original human explants, primary cells or cancer cell lines with cultures of immortalized cell lines with preserved stem cell characteristics appears to be superior for in vitro modeling of human implantation and early placentation. Remarkable advances in our understanding of the peri-implantation stages have also been made by advanced three dimensional (3D) models i.e. spheroids, organoids, and assembloids, as placental and endometrial surrogates. Much work remains to be done for the optimization and standardization of these integrated and complex models. The inclusion of immune components in these models would be an asset to delineate mechanisms of immune tolerance. Stem cell-based embryo-like models and surplus IVF embryos for research bring intriguing possibilities and are thought to be the trend for the next decade for in vitro modeling of human implantation and early embryogenesis. Along with this research, new ethical dilemmas such as the moral status of the human embryo and the potential exploitation of women consenting to donate their spare embryos have emerged. The careful appraisal and development of national legal and ethical frameworks are crucial for better regulation of studies using human embryos and embryoids to reach the potential benefits for human reproduction. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: We believe that our data provide a systematization of the available information on the modeling of human implantation and early placentation and will facilitate further research in this field. A strict classification of the advanced 3D models with their pros, cons, applicability, and availability would help improve the research quality to provide reliable outputs.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationModels, BiologicalPlacentationAnimalsFemaleHumansPregnancy2D and advanced 3D modelsanimal modelsex vivo modelshuman implantationstem cell-based embryo-like models

Identifiers

PMID39673726
PMCPMC12090058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.