Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673658›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2025

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated in Routine Medical Practice: Final Analysis of the ESTEEM Study.

Krupa Shah Pandey, Kathryn Giles, Konstantin Balashov, Richard Macdonell, Jörg Windsheimer, Mikel Martinez, Ivan Božin, Stephanie Raynaud, Matthew Scaramozza, Oksana Mokliatchouk and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02047097 (A Multicenter, Global, Observational Study to Collect Information on Safety and to Document the Drug Utilization of Tecfidera™), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02047097 completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Global, Observational Study to Collect Information on Safety and to Document the Drug Utilization of Tecfidera™ (Dimethyl Fumarate) When Used in Routine Medical Practice in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (ESTEEM)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiogenRan2013 to 2022Enrolled5,487ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsdimethyl fumarate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Krupa Shah PandeyHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Kathryn GilesCambridge Memorial Hospital, Cambridge, ON, Canada.
Konstantin BalashovChobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard MacdonellDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-3968
Jörg WindsheimerPraxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie, Nuremberg, Germany.
Mikel MartinezCentre Hospitalier Dax, Dax, France.
Ivan BožinBiogen, Baar, Switzerland. Ivan.Bozin@Biogen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2205-4233
Stephanie RaynaudFormerly: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Matthew ScaramozzaBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3738-459X
Oksana MokliatchoukBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Zhaonan SunBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-4387
Nicholas BelvisoBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yayoi SatoBiogen, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8747-2450
Xiaochen LinBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Annette OkaiNorth Texas Institute of Neurology and Headache, Plano, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDimethyl fumarate (DMF) has demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in clinical and real-world studies. The ESTEEM study (NCT02047097) was conducted to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of delayed-release DMF in patients with relapsing forms of MS in routine clinical practice. We report final outcomes from ESTEEM with up to 6.5 years of follow-up.

methodsPatients newly prescribed DMF were recruited from 393 sites globally. The primary objective was to assess the incidence and type of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation of DMF. Secondary objectives included assessment of DMF effectiveness on annualized relapse rate (ARR) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

resultsOverall, 5124 patients received ≥ 1 dose of DMF. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at enrollment was 40.0 (11.2) years; 74% of patients were female. Patients received DMF for a mean (SD) duration of 31.0 (22.7) months. Primary reasons for discontinuation were AEs (n = 1237; 24%); the most common were gastrointestinal AEs (n = 469; 9%), blood and lymphatic disorders (n = 218; 4%), and vascular disorders (n = 200; 4%). SAEs occurred in 391 (8%) patients, most commonly infections and infestations (n = 102; 2%). Adjusted ARR declined by 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90-91%; p < 0.0001), from 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.84) 12 months before enrollment to 0.08 (95% CI 0.08-0.09) 6 years after enrollment. The estimated proportion of patients free from confirmed disability progression sustained over 48 weeks was 87.0% at month 60. Mean scores for physical and psychological impact, fatigue, health, and productivity remained stable over 5 years.

conclusionDMF demonstrated a safety profile in real-world clinical practice consistent with the known profile of DMF. Relapse rates were low and both ARR and PROs remained stable over time.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02047097.

Indexed as

Dimethyl fumarateDisease-modifying treatmentEffectivenessMultiple sclerosisReal world

Identifiers

PMID39673658
PMCPMC11762038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.