Trial reportWorld journal of urology2024
Real-world utility of ChatGPT in pre-vasectomy counselling, a safe and efficient practice: a prospective single-centre clinical study.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Assisted Shared Decision-Making (SDM) in Rhinology: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Utilization of artificial intelligence in Men's Health: Opportunities for innovation and quality improvement.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Evaluating ChatGPT's role in urological counseling and clinical decision support.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Generative AI in urology: rethinking patient counselling and shared decision-making - a scoping review from the European Association of Urology Patient Office.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study sought to assess if pre-vasectomy counselling with ChatGPT can safely streamline the consultation process by reducing visit times and increasing patient satisfaction.
methodsA single-institution randomized pilot study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ChatGPT for pre-vasectomy counselling. All adult patients interested in undergoing a vasectomy were included. Unwillingness to provide consent or not having internet access constituted exclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to ChatGPT with standard in-person or in-person consultation without ChatGPT. Length of visit, number of questions asked, and a Likert scale questionnaire (on a scale of 10, with 10 being defined as great and 0 being defined as poor), were collected. Descriptive statistics and a comparative analysis were performed.
results18 patients were included with a mean age of 35.8 ± 5.4 (n = 9) in the intervention arm and 36.9 ± 7.4 (n = 9) in the control arm. Pre-vasectomy counselling with ChatGPT was associated with a higher provider perception of patient understanding of the procedure (8.8 ± 1.0 vs. 6.7 ± 2.8; p = 0.047) and a decreased length of in-person consultation (7.7 ± 2.3 min vs. 10.6 ± 3.4 min; p = 0.05). Quality of information provided by ChatGPT, ease of use, and overall experience were rated highly at 8.3 ± 1.9, 9.1 ± 1.5, and 8.6 ± 1.7, respectively.
conclusionsChatGPT for pre-vasectomy counselling improved the efficiency of consultations and the provider's perception of the patient's understanding of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39673635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.