ArticleCalcified tissue international2024
Bone Density of Vertebral Bodies and Ossified Masses in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: An Imaging Study Based on MRI, CT, and DEXA.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel CT soft tissue window-based visual scoring system for rapid assessment of bone density.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Evaluation of bone mineral density in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament utilizing vertebral bone quality and Hounsfield units.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- CT Hounsfield units in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-A comparison with other forms of degenerative cervical myelopathy using propensity score matching.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complications from anterior decompression fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often related to the bone mineral density (BMD) of vertebral bodies and ossified masses. The aim of this study was to clarify whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-scores reliably predict BMD in these structures, and whether vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and Hounsfield units (HU) can be effectively used to screen for osteopenia and osteoporosis. A total of 122 patients with cervical OPLL and 105 non-OPLL patients were included. Vertebral BMD was assessed by VBQ and HU, and ossified mass BMD was assessed by ossified mass bone quality (OMBQ) and ossification mass HU (OMHU). Overall, VBQ scores and HU values demonstrated weaker correlations with T-scores in the OPLL group compared with the non-OPLL group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that VBQ and HU effectively discriminated osteopenia/osteoporosis in the OPLL cohort, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.763 to 0.827, similar to the non-OPLL. No significant differences in BMD were observed between the OPLL and non-OPLL groups based on the common assessment of VBQ, HU and DEXA-derived BMD (p > 0.05). Both OMBQ and OMHU showed good reliability and were significantly correlated with T-scores (p < 0.05). In patients with cervical OPLL, VBQ and HU remain effective screening tools for osteopenia/osteoporosis, potentially guiding or obviating the need for further DEXA scans. Additionally, our findings suggest that patients with lower T-scores may exhibit reduced BMD in both vertebral bodies and ossified masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39673610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.