ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Validation and clinical impact of motion-free PET imaging using data-driven respiratory gating and elastic PET-CT registration.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging frontiers and challenges of artificial intelligence in PSMA-PET imaging: pioneering a new chapter in prostate cancer care.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Validation of a Deep-Learning Coregistration Framework for Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Using Low-Radiation-Exposure Protocols Across Various Tracers.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeClinical whole-body (WB) PET images can be compensated for respiratory motion using data-driven gating (DDG). However, PET DDG images may still exhibit motion artefacts at the diaphragm if the CT is acquired in a different respiratory phase than the PET image. This study evaluates the combined use of PET DDG and a deep-learning model (AIR-PETCT) for elastic registration of CT (WarpCT) to the non attenuation- and non scatter-corrected PET image (PET NAC), enabling improved PET reconstruction.
methodsThe validation cohort included 20 patients referred for clinical FDG PET/CT, undergoing two CT scans: a free respiration CT
resultsAIR-PETCT was robust and generated consistent WarpCTs when registering different CTs to the same PET NAC. The use of WarpCT instead of CT consistently led to equivalent or improved PET image quality. The algorithm significantly reduced "banana" artefacts and improved lesion-to-background ratios around the diaphragm. The blinded clinicians clearly preferred PET DDG images reconstructed using WarpCT.
conclusionAIR-PETCT effectively reduces respiratory motion artefacts from PET images, while improving lesion contrast. The combination of PET DDG and WarpCT holds promise for clinical application, improving PET image evaluation and diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39673603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.