Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673592›Full record

ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2025

Metacognition in nonhuman primates: a review of current knowledge.

Lorraine Subias, Noriko Katsu, Kazunori Yamada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorraine SubiasGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 1-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. subias.lorraine@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9175-1172
Noriko KatsuGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 1-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori YamadaGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 1-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP23H05428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metacognition, the ability to monitor and control one's own cognitive processes, has long been considered a hallmark of human cognition. However, two decades of research have provided compelling evidence of metacognitive-like abilities in some nonhuman primates. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the subject, highlighting key experimental paradigms and empirical findings, with an emphasis on the latest studies. Thanks to advances in methods and efforts to counter alternative explanations, there is now a consensus that great apes and some macaque species can monitor and control some of their cognitive processes. Despite numerous investigations, however, whether capuchin monkeys are metacognitive remains unclear. Critical gaps persist in our understanding of metacognition across species. We discuss the importance of expanding research to include a wider range of primate species and the potential role of ecological factors in shaping metacognitive capacities. In addition, we consider some promising avenues for future research, including neurophysiological approaches, studies of metacognitive errors, and field experiments.

Indexed as

CognitionMetacognitionPrimatesAnimalsLiterature reviewMetacognitionNonhuman primatesPhylogenetic comparison

Identifiers

PMID39673592
PMCPMC11735554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.