ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Associations Between State Laws Regulating Minors' Access to Confidential Sexual Health Services and Lifetime HIV Testing Among U.S. Male High School Students.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Confidentiality concerns are a well-established barrier to sexual health services for adolescents. These barriers are likely even greater for young men who have sex with men (YMSM), who often experience stigma at multiple levels. This study examined the relationship between state laws regulating minors' access to confidential sexual health services, sexual behavior, and lifetime HIV testing among a large, representative sample of sexually active male high school students from the 2019 state-level Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (23 states; N = 17,509). We used multilevel logistic regression to examine whether confidentiality-promoting state laws (i.e., states that explicitly allowed minors to self-consent to HIV testing, did not have an age clause which set a minimum age to self-consent to sexual health services, did not permit parental notification, had confidentiality protections for insured dependents) were associated with lifetime HIV testing, and whether associations differed between YMSM (n = 1,718) and young men who have sex with women only (i.e., YMSWO; n = 15,791). After adjusting for individual- and state-level characteristics, HIV testing was significantly more likely for students in states that explicitly allowed minors to self-consent to HIV testing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.21, p <.001), did not permit parental notification (aOR: 1.09, CI: 1.05-1.12, p <.001), or had confidentiality protections for insured dependents (aOR: 1.40, CI: 1.34-1.45, p <.001), and significantly less likely for those in states that lacked age clauses (aOR: 0.82, CI: 0.80-0.84, p <.001). We found no evidence for moderation of these associations by YMSM status (i.e., the effects of laws being confidentiality-promoting on HIV testing did not differ significantly for YMSM and YMSWO). Findings suggest that certain confidentiality-promoting state laws may be effective at increasing HIV testing among sexually active male adolescents, regardless of sexual behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.