Trial reportCurrent medical science2024
Effect of Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programmed intermittent bolus for erector spinae plane block versus intercostal nerve block in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Effect of serratus anterior plane block versus fentanyl for postoperative pain control and stress response after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: Randomised controlled study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) improves the quality of recovery (QoR) and decreases postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
methodsThis was a single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 120 patients were randomized to groups at a 1:1 ratio. They received general anaesthesia and an ESP catheter (ropivacaine or normal saline) before surgery, and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and continuous ESPB with a pulse injection of 8 mL (ropivacaine or normal saline) per h after 20 mL of the experimental drug was administered at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the severity of pain, sufentanil consumption, incidence of rescue analgesia, and proportion of patients with chronic pain.
resultsThe QoR-15 score was greater in the ESPB group than in the control group at 24 h after surgery [112 (108-118) vs. 109 (101-114), P=0.023]. ESPB was associated with a lower cough visual analogue scale (VAS) score (44 vs. 47, P=0.001), resting VAS score (28 vs. 35.5, P=0.003), sufentanil consumption (104.8 µg vs. 145.5 µg, P=0.000), and incidence of rescue analgesia (20.0% vs. 43.3%, P=0.006).
conclusionContinuous ESPB mildly improved the QoR-15 score in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39673581What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.