Trial reportFamily practice2025
The relationship between self-care preparedness and quality of life in a 3-year-follow-up: a study in primary health care.
Trial report in Family practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring self-care preparedness may enable better support for patients in general practice.
objectiveThis study assessed the relationship between the self-care preparedness index (SCPI) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a longitudinal analysis over 36 months.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of an intervention group of a randomized controlled trial. Participants were adults (n = 256) with hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease in primary health care. The intervention group was included in the present study since they had answered SCPI as a part of the intervention. The relationship between SCPI and HRQoL (15D) and other outcomes were studied at baseline. The mean changes in SCPI and 15D were calculated from baseline up to 36 months. Regression-based analysis was used to study to what extent the baseline SCPI was associated with the change in SCPI and 15D and to what extent the change in SCPI was associated with the change in 15D.
resultsAt baseline, 15D, physical activity, self-rated health, life satisfaction, and patient activation measures had a positive linear relationship with SCPI. Body mass index and depressive symptoms had a negative linear relationship with SCPI. The longitudinal association between changes in SCPI and 15D was statistically significant and positive. The adjusted β was + 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.07 to 0.30, P = .002).
conclusionThose patients who managed to increase their SCPI over the study period experienced an improvement in HRQoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.