ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2024
Simulation-based process optimization of full-scale advanced wastewater treatment systems using powdered activated carbon.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study extends a previously developed competitive modeling approach for predicting the adsorption of organic micropollutants (OMPs) on powdered activated carbon (PAC) in full-scale advanced wastewater treatment. The approach incorporates adsorption analysis for organic matter fractionation, assumes pseudo-first order kinetics and differentiates between fresh and partially loaded PAC through fraction segregation. Validation through full-scale measurement campaigns reveals successful model predictions of OMP removal, underestimating, however, diclofenac removals by 15-20%. Based on model testing, the impact of excess PAC return to the biological stage enhanced OMP removal, reaching up to 15% improvement for benzotriazole, carbamazepine and metoprolol, but no evident improvement of diclofenac removal. Intermittent PAC dosing revealed rapid process response, where organic matter concentration increased within 2 h after PAC cut-off. The simulation-based study demonstrated that during rain events, the overall OMP removal efficiency in the entire wastewater treatment plant was reduced by approximately 50% due to a shift of OMP concentration and a shortened hydraulic retention time in the biological and adsorption stages. Testing of various PAC dosing strategies revealed potential PAC savings of 10-15% compared to inflow-proportional dosing by using predefined OMP removal grades or maximum allowable effluent OMP concentrations as criteria for PAC dosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39673316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.