Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673173›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance in Adult Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis.

Vikas Gupta, Michael J Satlin, Kalvin Yu, Yehoda M Martei, Lillian Sung, Lars F Westblade, Scott C Howard, ChinEn Ai, Diane C Flayhart

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Cancer Patients with Sepsis: Prognostic Insights from a Population-Based Cohort Study in Norway.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vikas GuptaBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Michael J SatlinTransplant-Oncology Infectious Diseases Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Kalvin YuBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Yehoda M MarteiDepartment of Medicine (Hematology-Oncology Division), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lillian SungDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-3091
Lars F WestbladeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Scott C HowardResonance Inc., Arlington, TN, USA.
ChinEn AiBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Diane C FlayhartBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6229-4618

Funding

AMR Action Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfections are a leading cause of death in patients with cancer, but the proportion and rate of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in hospitalized patients with cancer are not well understood.

methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of AMR assessed hospitalized adult patients in 168 United States (US) healthcare facilities between April 2018 and December 2022. Nonduplicate, noncontaminant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria recovered from various samples (blood, respiratory, urine, etc.) were used to assess the rate of AMR pathogens per 1000 admissions and the proportion of AMR among bacterial isolates in patients with and without cancer.

findingsAmong 4,612,620 admissions, 6.4% (297,500) were of patients with cancer and 93.6% (4,315,120) were of patients without cancer. AMR pathogen rates were higher in cancer patients than patients without cancer for most pathogen groups, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci with incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84, 2.07), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers (IRR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.43, 1.53]), carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales (IRR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.32, 1.61]), and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.18, 1.45]). The percentage of nonsusceptible isolates in most pathogen groups was lower in patients with versus without cancer except for ESBL producers among Enterobacterales (odds ratio (OR), 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07, 1.15]) and vancomycin resistance among enterococci (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.14, 1.30]), which were higher in cancer patients.

conclusionAMR rates for certain key pathogens were 1.5-2 times greater in hospitalized cancer patients compared to hospitalized noncancer patients. The increased AMR rate in cancer patients highlights the need for enhanced infection prevention and diagnostic stewardship efforts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHospitalizationNeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistance (AMR) incidence; hospitalized patientsgram‐negative bacteriagram‐positive bacteriaRRID:SCR_000432RRID:SCR_001905

Identifiers

PMID39673173
PMCPMC11645461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.