Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673057›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Disorientation as a delirium feature in non-intubated patients: development and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of the 'Confusion Assessment Method for Intermediate Care Unit' (CAM-IMC) - a prospective cohort study.

L P Beyer, L von Zur Gathen, B El Rayah, O Dewald, T Zieschang, A Diers, E Wesley Ely, U Guenther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L P Beyer *Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany. lukas.paul.beyer@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-1019
L von Zur Gathen *Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany.
B El RayahUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie/Intensivmedizin/Notfallmedizin/Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Universitätsmedizin Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
O DewaldUniversitätsklinik für Herzchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
T ZieschangFakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany.
A DiersUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie/Intensivmedizin/Notfallmedizin/Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Universitätsmedizin Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
E Wesley ElyCritical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
U GuentherFakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisorientation is an early indicator of developing postoperative delirium (POD), which is associated with increased mortality and cognitive decline. The well-established "Confusion-Assessment-Method-for-Intensive-Care-Unit" (CAM-ICU) for diagnosing POD in intubated patients cannot make use of the feature 'disorientation', as this requires verbal communication. Other tools such as the 4AT test for disorientation but are not established in ICU settings. We therefore combined test-variables of the CAM-ICU (level of consciousness, fluctuating mental status and inattention) with verbal testing for disorientation to develop and enhance diagnostic accuracy of the "Confusion Assessment Method for Intermediate Care Unit" (CAM-IMC). In the present study we describe the development and the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-IMC.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort-study to develop and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-IMC and disorientation for diagnosing POD in non-intubated patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. All patients were eligible during data collection period. Exclusion criteria were preexisting brain-organic disease, age < 50 years, preoperative intubation, and insufficient language skills. Patients were assessed for POD using the CAM-IMC as the index-test by two independent examiners over three postoperative days. Reference-testing was conducted by experienced reference-raters. The primary outcome was the diagnostic test-performance.

resultsAmong 178 eligible patients, 624 paired observations were completed with 155 patients. Of these, 9% experienced POD. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (CI-95%: 0.87-1.00) and 0.94 (CI-95%: 0.92-0.96), respectively. Area-Under-the-Receiver-Operating-Characteristic-Curve (AUROC; equivalent to c-statistic) for CAM-IMC with a cut-off at three points was 0.95 (CI-95%: 0.93-0.98). The interrater reliability was 0.80 (CI-95%: 0.69-0.91).

conclusionThe CAM-IMC demonstrates excellent test performance for diagnosing POD in non-intubated patients by combining features of the CAM-ICU with 'disorientation'. Given an aging community with an increasing delirium risk, the CAM-IMC provides a highly structured assessment tool for POD. It enables early and accurate detection of delirium, which is critical for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. The CAM-IMC appears to be a useful tool to be implemented in units for not-intubated patients and seems to be the perfect match where the CAM-ICU is already in use for monitoring POD.

trial registrationDRKS00026980 (German registry of clinical studies).

Indexed as

ConfusionDeliriumAgedCardiac Surgical ProceduresCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCAM-ICUCAM-IMCDeliriumDisorientationNon-intubatedPOD

Identifiers

PMID39673057
PMCPMC11639109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.