ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Retrospective longitudinal study on the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on polysomnographic evaluation in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on polysomnographic evaluation in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study of two consecutive overnight polysomnograms (PSG) in 92 PWS patients (mean age 9.1, range 3.1-22 years). 57/92 participants (35 female) had a COVID-19 infection between the two consecutive examinations. 35 patients (21 female) had no infection (control group). Distribution of genetics was as follows: 13/57 (22.8%) deletion, 19/57 (33.3%) uniparental disomy, 2/57 (3,5%) imprinting defect, 3/57 (5.3%) non-deletion, 20/57 (35.1%) diagnosed by analyses of the methylation pattern of chromosome 15q11-13. Mean time interval between COVID-19 infection and post-COVID-19 evaluation was 96.2 days.
resultsCourse of COVID-19 infection was asymptomatic 8/82 (9.8%), mild 63/82 (76.8%), medium 11/84 (13.4%). The five most frequently experienced symptoms in PWS patients were fever (56.1%); headache (45.1%); cold (42.7%); cough (31.7%) and body aches (21.95%). PWS patients who had COVID-19 infection had significantly lower mean oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry (post 94.8% vs. pre 95.7%, p = 0.001), lower detected lowermost SpO2 (post 86.2 vs. pre 87.3%, p = 0.003), and higher occurrence of hypopnoea (post 13.9 vs. pre 10.7, p = 0.001). Time in optimal SpO2 (95-100%) decreased significantly (post 54.3% vs. pre 73.8%, p = 0.001), whereas an increase was observed in time in suboptimal SpO2 (90-95%) (post 45.5% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001) and in time in poor SpO2 (< 90%) (post 0.7% vs. pre 0.2%, p = 0.030). Body-Mass-Index (BMI)-SDS for PWS showed no differences between the groups at any time. BMI-SDS-differences showed no influence on differences in SpO2 evaluations. In the genetic subgroup with deletion there was a statistically significant effect on an increased number of OSA (p = 0.027). The genetic subgroup with uniparental disomy (UPD) was associated with a reduced risk of higher HF (p = 0.035) and less hypopnea (p = 0.011).
conclusionPWS patients predominantly experienced only mild to medium symptoms during COVID-19 infection without necessity of hospitalisation. However, on average three months after infection, differences in PSG evaluations were still apparent, manifesting in lower SpO2 and more frequent hypopnea. A long-lasting impairment of the pulmonary system due to the COVID-19 infection might be responsible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.