Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39673009›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Single-View Fluoroscopic X-Ray Pose Estimation: A Comparison of Alternative Loss Functions and Volumetric Scene Representations.

Chaochao Zhou, Syed Hasib Akhter Faruqui, Dayeong An, Abhinav Patel, Ramez N Abdalla, Michael C Hurley, Ali Shaibani, Matthew B Potts, Babak S Jahromi, Sameer A Ansari and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chaochao ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. chaochao.zhou@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-2622
Syed Hasib Akhter FaruquiDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dayeong AnDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abhinav PatelDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ramez N AbdallaDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael C HurleyDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ali ShaibaniDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew B PottsDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Babak S JahromiDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sameer A AnsariDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Donald R CantrellDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. donald.cantrell@nm.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many tasks performed in image-guided procedures can be cast as pose estimation problems, where specific projections are chosen to reach a target in 3D space. In this study, we construct a framework for fluoroscopic pose estimation and compare alternative loss functions and volumetric scene representations. We first develop a differentiable projection (DiffProj) algorithm for the efficient computation of Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) from either Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) or neural scene representations. We introduce two innovative neural scene representations, Neural Tuned Tomography (NeTT) and masked Neural Radiance Fields (mNeRF). Pose estimation is then performed within the framework by iterative gradient descent using loss functions that quantify the image discrepancy of the synthesized DRR with respect to the ground-truth, target fluoroscopic X-ray image. We compared alternative loss functions and volumetric scene representations for pose estimation using a dataset consisting of 50 cranial tomographic X-ray sequences. We find that Mutual Information significantly outperforms alternative loss functions for pose estimation, avoiding entrapment in local optima. The alternative discrete (CBCT) and neural (NeTT and mNeRF) volumetric scene representations yield comparable performance (3D angle errors, mean ≤ 3.2° and 90% quantile ≤ 3.4°); however, the neural scene representations incur a considerable computational expense to train.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPostureAlgorithmsFluoroscopyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerCone-beam computerized tomographyDifferentiable projectionDigitally reconstructed radiographLoss functionsMasked neural radiance fieldNeural tuned tomographySingle-view X-ray pose estimation

Identifiers

PMID39673009
PMCPMC12572448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.