ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
The Impact of Language Discordance on Acquiring Broad Social History: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Clinicians, and Interpreters.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBy acquiring a broad social history (BSH), which includes aspects of patients' social needs in addition to their hobbies and activities, values, and perspectives on care, clinicians can provide more patient-centered care, which is known to improve health outcomes. However, the impact of patient-clinician language discordance on acquisition of BSH has not been well studied.
objectiveTo ascertain whether language discordance impacts clinicians' acquisition of patients' BSH by interviewing patients, clinicians, and medical interpreters.
designQualitative study based on semi-structured interviews, followed by thematic analysis using rapid qualitative data analysis methods. PARTICIPANTS (OR PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS): We interviewed 8 Spanish-speaking and 5 English-speaking patients seen for primary care within a public hospital in San Francisco, 6 primary care clinicians, and 8 medical interpreters. APPROACH: All interviews were recorded and transcribed. The transcriptions were summarized into domains using rapid qualitative data analysis. The summaries were displayed in a matrix and used to generate themes and subthemes. KEY
resultsAnalysis of interviews highlighted two overarching themes concerning BSH acquisition. One theme was the importance of BSH: namely, it is critical for patient-clinician relationships and personalized care. Commonly elicited BSH facets were social drivers of health, but leisure activities were less frequently asked. The second theme described ways in which language discordance, via the need for interpretation, affects the collection of BSH, both through increasing time pressure, and hindering rapport-building strategies. Cultural barriers pose an obstacle to BSH acquisition and may operate independently of language discordance.
conclusionsOur results suggest two action steps for health systems: (a) apportioning more time for language-discordant visits to increase rapport-building and BSH acquisition, and (b) increasing training for clinicians on acquiring BSH when working with interpreters. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between language discordance, acquisition of BSH, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.