Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39672974›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Artificial intelligence in the care of children and adolescents with chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Janna-Lina Kerth, Maurus Hagemeister, Anne C Bischops, Lisa Reinhart, Juergen Dukart, Bert Heinrichs, Simon B Eickhoff, Thomas Meissner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Artificial intelligence in preventive medicine for children and adolescents-applications and acceptance].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  12. Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care - Patients' Perceptions on Caregiving Relationships and Ethics: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janna-Lina Kerth *Dept. of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany. janna-lina.kerth@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-9537
Maurus Hagemeister *Dept. of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0867-9690
Anne C BischopsDept. of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3472-0260
Lisa ReinhartDept. of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7593-7228
Juergen DukartInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-5644
Bert HeinrichsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-0078
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-2759
Thomas MeissnerDept. of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-5546

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GP2203B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has shown potential for various applications in the medical field, particularly for diagnosing and managing chronic diseases among children and adolescents. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze and synthesize research on the use of AI for monitoring, guiding, and assisting pediatric patients with chronic diseases. Five major electronic databases were searched (Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, ACM, Web of Science), along with manual searches of gray literature, personal archives, and reference lists of relevant papers. All original studies as well as conference abstracts and proceedings, focusing on AI applications for pediatric chronic disease care were included. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. We extracted AI method used, study design, population, intervention, and main results. Two researchers independently extracted data and resolved discrepancies through discussion. AI applications are diverse, encompassing, e.g., disease classification, outcome prediction, or decision support. AI generally performed well, though most models were tested on retrospective data. AI-based tools have shown promise in mental health analysis, e.g., by using speech sampling or social media data to predict therapy outcomes for various chronic conditions.

conclusionsWhile AI holds potential in pediatric chronic disease care, most reviewed studies are small-scale research projects. Prospective clinical implementations are needed to validate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Ethical considerations, cultural influences, and stakeholder attitudes should be integrated into future research. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Artificial Intelligence (AI) will play a more dominant role in medicine and healthcare in the future and many applications are already being developed. WHAT IS NEW: • Our review provides an overview on how AI-driven systems might be able to support children and adolescents with chronic illnesses. • While many applications are being researched, few have been tested on real-world, prospective, clinical data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdolescentChildChronic DiseaseHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceChronically Ill children and adolescentsMachine learningPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39672974
PMCPMC11645428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.