ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
12 real forensic cases solved by the DNA STR-typing of skeletal remains exposed to extreme environment conditions, without the conventional bone pulverization step.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From theory to practice: Protocol adaptations for swift victim identification in the forensic response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA identification of human skeletal remains play a valuable role in the forensic field, especially in missing persons and mass disasters investigation. Hard tissues, such as bones and teeth, represent a very common kind of samples analyzed in forensic laboratories because often they are the only biological materials remaining. However, the major limitation in using these compact samples rely on time consuming and labor-intensive treatment of grinding them into powder before proceeding with the conventional DNA purification and extraction step. In this context, a novel DNA extraction assay, called the TBone Ex kit (DNA Chip Research Inc.), was developed to digests bone chips without powdering "as reported by Kitayama (JAMA 12:84-89, 2010)." Here, we simultaneously analyzed bone and tooth samples obtained by our police laboratory that belonged to 15 different forensic cases from Sardinia (Italy). The total of 27 samples were recovered from different scenarios and were exposed to extreme environmental factors, including sunlight, seawater, soil, fauna, vegetation and high temperature and humidity. The TBone Ex kit was used prior to the EZ2 DNA extraction kit on the EZ2 Connect Fx instrument (Qiagen), and high quality autosomal and Y-chromosome STRs profiles were obtained for the 80% of the cases, in a relatively short time frame. This study provides additional support for the use of the TBone Ex kit for digesting bone fragments/whole teeth as an effective alternative to pulverization protocols. We empirically demonstrated the effectiveness of the kit in processing multiple bone samples simultaneously, largely simplifying the DNA extraction procedure, and the good yield of recovered DNA for downstream genetic typing in highly compromised forensic real specimens. In conclusion, the results of this study appear useful for forensic laboratories, to which the various actors of the criminal justice system - such as potential jury members, judges, defense attorneys and prosecutors - require immediate feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39672942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.