ReviewRMD open2024
Clinical, genetic and omics-based biomarkers that might support the identification of the development of psoriatic arthritis in individuals with psoriasis: a narrative review of the literature.
Review in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Biologic Therapies on the Risk of Progression from Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating immune cell biomarkers in Psoriatic Arthritis: associations with clinical manifestations and treatment response in the TOFA-PREDICT trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Trial
- Prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors: a systematic literature review to inform the development of EULAR Points to Consider for the definition of Difficult-to-Manage and Treatment-Refractory psoriatic arthritis.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Major Autohemotherapy (MAH) in Psoriasis Patients Using Serum Inflammatory Markers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is known that 25%-30% of individuals with cutaneous psoriasis (PsC) will develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA). To date, the reasons for the development of PsA in individuals with PsC have not been identified. Furthermore, there are considerable delays in the diagnosis and treatment of PsA, which lead to joint and bone deformation and chronic pain. It is therefore important to develop more precise diagnostic and screening tools. In this narrative review of the literature, clinical risk factors and novel molecular biomarkers (genetic markers, blood and inflammatory markers, lipid, metabolite and protein biomarkers) have been evaluated. The review included 38 publications that were reported between May 2020 and May 2024. Similar to previous reviews, nail involvement was one of the strongest clinical risk factors for the development of PsA, while molecular biomarkers did not provide a clear and robust differentiation between PsC and PsA groups. The seemingly poor performance of molecular markers may be largely attributed to small study populations and heterogeneity in study designs. Data and sample sharing in large consortia such as HIPPOCRATES (Health initiatives in Psoriasis and PsOriatic arthritis ConsoRTium European States) could help to overcome the limitations of small studies and enable the development of more robust diagnostic and screening tools for PsA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.