Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671597›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Electronic Communication Between Children's Caregivers and Health Care Teams: Scoping Review on Parental Caregiver's Perceptions and Experience.

Mary Jo Gamper, Rebecca Singer Cohen, Maryam Esperanza Razaz, Elaina Parrillo, Clifton P Thornton, Aleksandra Wec, Kathryn McDonald, Kelly T Gleason

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary Jo Gamper *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0009-0004-8189-9421
Rebecca Singer Cohen *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0009-0004-8375-8526
Maryam Esperanza Razaz *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-9833
Elaina Parrillo *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0000-0001-6824-0017
Clifton P Thornton *Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Pediatric Nursing Research & Evidence-Based Practice, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7130-7777
Aleksandra Wec *Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-3678
Kathryn McDonald *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-5744
Kelly T Gleason *Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1 (410) 955-4766.ORCID 0000-0002-4203-6517

Funding

Strength-Based Health Equity Across the Life CourseT32NR020315 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAE-RA HAN · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR020315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Asynchronous communication via electronic modes (e-communication), including patient portals, secure messaging services, SMS text messaging, and email, is increasingly used to supplement synchronous face-to-face medical visits; however, little is known about its quality in pediatric settings. Objective: This review aimed to summarize contemporary literature on pediatric caregivers' experiences with and perspectives of e-communication with their child's health care team to identify how e-communication has been optimized to improve patient care. Methods: A scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science using terms such as "Electronic Health Records" and "Communication" from 2013 to 2023 that discussed caregiver experiences and perspectives of e-communication with their child's health care provider. Studies were excluded if they were abstracts, non-English papers, nonscientific papers, systematic reviews, or quality improvement initiatives, or pertained to synchronous telemedicine. We conducted a two-step screening process by scanning the title and abstract and reviewing the full text by two independent screeners to confirm eligibility. From an initial 903 articles identified via the database search, 23 articles fulfilled all the inclusion criteria and are included in this review. Results: Of the 23 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, 11 used quantitative methods, 7 used qualitative methods, and 5 used mixed methods. The caregiver sample sizes ranged from 51 to 3339 in the quantitative studies and 8 to 36 in the qualitative and mixed methods studies. A majority (n=17) used the patient portal that was self-categorized by the study. Secure messaging through a portal or other mobile health app was used in 26% (n=6) of the studies, while nonsecure messaging outside of the portal was used 17% (n=4) of the time and email was used 33.3% (n=8) of the time. In 19 of the studies, parents reported positive experiences with and a desire for e-communication methods. Conclusions: The literature overwhelmingly supported caregiver satisfaction with and desire for e-communication in health care, but no literature intentionally studied how to improve the quality of e-communication, which is a critical gap to address.

Indexed as

electronic communicationmobile phoneparental caregiverpatient-clinician relationshippatient portalprovider-patient relationsrelational coordination theory

Identifiers

PMID39671597
PMCPMC11661689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.