Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671559›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2024

Dermatology in Student-Run Clinics in the United States: Scoping Review.

Samir Kamat, Aneesh Agarwal, Leore Lavin, Hannah Verma, Lily Martin, Jules B Lipoff

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samir KamatDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-231X
Aneesh AgarwalDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-3763
Leore LavinDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-5282
Hannah VermaDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-7828
Lily MartinDepartment of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-866X
Jules B LipoffDepartment of Dermatology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, 225 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, United States, 1 215-482-7546.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-4260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Student-run clinics (SRCs) for dermatology hold potential to significantly advance skin-related health equity, and a comprehensive analysis of these clinics may inform strategies for optimizing program effectiveness. Objective: We aimed to perform a scoping review of the literature about dermatology SRCs across the United States. Methods: We conducted systematic literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus on March 1, 2023, and June 19, 2024. No date, language, or paper-type restrictions were included in the search strategy. A total of 229 references were uploaded to Covidence for screening by 2 independent reviewers (SK and LL), and 23 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility. After an additional 8 documents were identified through a gray literature search, a total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies set in an SRC, which was operationally led by medical students and could render condition-relevant treatments to patients, with dermatology care; (2) published in English; (3) within the United States; (4) included characterization of any of the following: logistics, care, patients, or design; and (5) included all study or document types, including gray literature that was not peer reviewed (eg, conference abstracts, preprints, and letters to the editor). Exclusion criteria were (1) papers not published in English and (2) those with duplicated data or that were limited in scope or not generalizable. Data were extracted qualitatively using Microsoft Excel to categorize the studies by several domains, including clinic location, demographics, services offered, and barriers to care. Results: There are at least 19 dermatology SRCs across the United States. The most common conditions encountered included atopic dermatitis; acne; fungal infections; benign nevi; psoriasis; and neoplasms, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Key facilitators for the clinics included faculty oversight, attending physician participation for biopsy histopathology, and dedicated program coordinators. Major barriers included lack of follow-up, medication nonadherence, and patient no-shows. Conclusions: Dermatology SRCs serve a diverse patient population, many of whom are underrepresented in traditional dermatology settings. This scoping review provides insights to help build stronger program foundations that better address community dermatologic health needs.

Indexed as

DermatologyStudent Run ClinicHumansSkin DiseasesStudents, MedicalUnited Statesdermatologicaldermatologistdermatologymedical educationPRISMAreviewscoping reviewstudent-run clinicunderserved populationvolunteerism

Identifiers

PMID39671559
PMCPMC11661691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.