ArticlePloS one2024
Evaluation of anxiety level and the factors Affecting Anxiety in health care workers in Shahid Dr. Gholipour Hospital, Bukan, Iran during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe rapid and dangerous spread of Covid-19 has caused psychological problems, especially anxiety among health care workers. Due to the lack of accurate information on the prevalence of anxiety and the factors affecting it among health care workers, especially in developing countries, this study aimed to investigate the level of anxiety and the effective factors in health care workers in Shahid Dr. Gholipour Hospital in Bukan, Iran in Covid-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out through census sampling among health care workers of the hospital. Totally, 358 participants entered the study. Data gathering tool consisted of a demographical information tool and Spielberger's Anxiety scale. To determine the effective variables on hidden and obvious anxiety use liner regression. significant predictors variable of anxiety was determined by logistic regression.
findingsMeans score for obvious anxiety was 47.005 (5.4) CI: 46.47-47.54 and for hidden anxiety was 42.790 (4.88) CI: 42.43-43.29. Factors affecting participants' obvious anxiety based on the Unadjusted model were Work experience, Age group, Marital status and History of anxiety disorders and gender. In the Adjusted model, the age group and the anxiety history are considered as effective variables. One of the effective factors on hidden anxiety is the effect of gender variable in both Adjusted and Unadjusted models. Based on logistic regression test, job variables, age groups, marital status (are predicted variables of obvious anxiety. In hidden anxiety, marital status was introduced as a predictor variable.
conclusionThe majority of personnel experienced a high level of anxiety during the pandemic. Psychological examination and interventions are essential for the health care workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.