ArticlePloS one2024
Prediction method of sugarcane important phenotype data based on multi-model and multi-task.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging AI and integrated genomic-enviromic prediction for intelligent sugarcane breeding.Plant communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of generalized sugarcane yield prediction models holds significant implications for global food security. Given that machine learning algorithms often surpass the precision of remote sensing technology, further exploration of machine learning algorithms in the development of sugarcane yield prediction models is imperative. In this study, we employed six key phenotypic traits of sugarcane, specifically plant height, stem diameter, third-node length (internode length), leaf length, leaf width, and field brix, along with eight machine learning methods: logistic regression, linear regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, and the XGBoost algorithm. The aim was to establish an intelligent model ensemble for predicting two crucial phenotypic characteristics-stem diameter and plant height-that determine sugarcane yield, ultimately enhancing the overall yield.The experimental findings indicate that the XGBoost algorithm outperforms the other seven algorithms in predicting these significant phenotypic traits of sugarcane. Furthermore, an analysis of the sugarcane intelligent prediction model's performance under a specialized data environment, incorporating self-prepared data, reveals that the XGBoost algorithm exhibits greater stability. Notably, the data pertaining to these crucial phenotypic traits have a profound impact on the efficacy of the intelligent models. The research demonstrates that a sugarcane yield prediction model ensemble, incorporating multiple intelligent algorithms, can accurately forecast stem diameter and plant height, thereby predicting sugarcane yield. Additionally, this approach, combined with the principles of sugarcane cross-breeding, provides a valuable reference for the artificial breeding of new sugarcane varieties that excel in stem diameter and plant height, bridging a research gap in indirect yield prediction through sugarcane phenotypic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.