Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671422›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Hybrid SEM-ANN model for predicting undergraduates' e-learning continuance intention based on perceived educational and emotional support.

Shanshan Xu, Yangxin Wang, Wenbo Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shanshan XuSchool of Fine Arts, Yuzhang Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yangxin WangSchool of Fine Arts, Yuzhang Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wenbo LuoSchool of Fine Arts, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3375-3393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM), this study explores the impact of perceived educational and emotional support on university students' continuance intention to engage in e-learning. Researchers conducted a survey using structured questionnaires among 368 university students from three universities in Jiangxi Province. They measured their self-reported responses on six constructs: perceived educational support, perceived emotional support, perceived usefulness, confirmation, satisfaction, and continuance intention. The relationships between predictors and continuance intention, characterized by non-compensatory and non-linear dynamics, were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling combined with Artificial Neural Networks. Apart from the direct effects of perceived educational and emotional support on perceived usefulness being non-significant, all other hypotheses were confirmed. Furthermore, according to the normalized importance derived from the multilayer perceptron analysis, satisfaction was identified as the most critical predictor (100%), followed by confirmation (29.9%), perceived usefulness (28.3%), perceived educational support (22.6%), and perceived emotional support (21.6%). These constructs explained 62.1% of the total variance in the students' continuance intention to engage in e-learning. This study utilized a two-stage analytical approach, enhancing the depth and accuracy of data processing and expanding the methodological scope of research in educational technology. The findings of this study contribute to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 4, which aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all by 2030. It provides direction for future research in different environmental and cultural contexts.

Indexed as

IntentionNeural Networks, ComputerStudentsAdolescentAdultEducation, DistanceEmotionsFemaleHumansLearningMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39671422
PMCPMC11643250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.