ArticlePloS one2024
Socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in adolescent fertility rates in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSierra Leone, like many other sub-Saharan African countries, grapples with the challenge of high adolescent fertility rates. This study examines the socio-economic and geographical inequalities in adolescent fertility rates in Sierra Leone between 2008 and 2019.
methodsThree rounds of the Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Surveys (2008, 2013, and 2019) were analysed to examine inequalities in adolescent fertility rates. Descriptive analyses were performed using the online version of the World Health Organization's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit software. Adolescent fertility rate was stratified using four dimensions: economic status, education, place of residence, and province. Difference (D), ratio (R), population attributable risk (PAR) and population attributable fraction (PAF) were calculated as measures of inequality.
resultsThe adolescent fertility rates in Sierra Leone declined from 142.5 births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years in 2008 to 103.5 births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years in 2019. For economic status, inequality in adolescent fertility rates decreased from 117.3 births per 1,000 adolescent girls in 2008 to 110.6 in 2019. The PAF indicated that the national adolescent fertility rate could have been 46.8% lower in 2008, 42.5% lower in 2013, and 53.5% lower in 2019 if all wealth quintiles had the same fertility rates as the wealthiest quintile (quintile 5). Educational inequality in adolescent fertility rates decreased significantly, from 135.3 births per 1,000 adolescent girls in 2008 to 75.8 in 2019. The PAF showed that the setting average of adolescent fertility rate could have been 57.9% lower in 2008, 33.1% lower in 2013, and 23.9% lower in 2019 without education-related disparities. For place of residence, inequality between urban and rural areas decreased from 82.3 births per 1,000 adolescent girls in 2008 to 74.5 in 2019. The PAF indicated that the national adolescent fertility rate could have been 32.9% lower in 2008, 30.7% lower in 2013, and 33.9% lower in 2019 if rural girls had the same fertility rates as urban girls. Our results further showed that inequality based on province decreased from 77.9 births per 1,000 adolescent girls in 2008 to 64.0 in 2019. The PAF showed that the national average of adolescent fertility rates could have been 34.6% lower in 2008, 37.6% lower in 2013, and 35.8% lower in 2019 without provincial disparities.
conclusionOur study found a positive decline in AFR across socioeconomic and geographic groups in Sierra Leone, but significant inequalities remain. Economic status and education are key drivers, with the poorest quintile consistently showing higher AFR. Although AFR declined among girls across all levels of education over time, it increased between 2008 and 2019 for those with primary and higher education. Rural areas had a higher AFR than urban ones, though with less national impact. Policymakers should focus on improving economic opportunities, enhancing quality education, and expanding access to family planning services to reduce adolescent pregnancy and address socioeconomic and educational inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.