ArticlePloS one2024
Safety profile of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimisation of a Topical Miltefosine Carbopol-Based Gel for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Antileishmanial Activity After Storage and Drug Response.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cross-Species Hepatic Metabolism of the Antileishmanial Chalcone NAT22 Generates Metabolites with Predicted Enhanced Affinity for the Parasite Target cTXNPx.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Anti-Leishmanial Activity of the Hydroalcoholic Extract of Green Algae (Spirogyra): Investigation of Weight Indicators (Lesion Size and Organ Weights) in BALB/c Mice.Acta parasitologica · 2025Article
- Miltefosine implementation for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: access indicators in the state of Minas Gerais, 2021-2024.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical disease that poses a significant public health challenge in Brazil and worldwide. Miltefosine, the only orally administered drug available for CL, was recently incorporated into Brazil's treatment protocols following recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) and revisions by national health authorities. While this represents an important advancement, miltefosine is associated with frequent gastrointestinal side effects and potential teratogenic risks, necessitating careful patient eligibility assessments and close clinical monitoring throughout treatment. Furthermore, the absence of national effectiveness data underscores the need for careful monitoring during large-scale implementation. This study, part of a broader implementation monitoring process, seeks to estimate the frequency, intensity, and seriousness of adverse events (AEs) associated with miltefosine. It also aims to identify factors linked to treatment discontinuation during the pilot phase of miltefosine distribution in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Descriptive analyses were performed to present measures of central tendency and dispersion for the variables. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was conducted to explore relationships between explanatory variables and outcomes of interest. Between 2021 and 2023, 77.1% of patients treated with miltefosine experienced at least one AE. The rate of serious AEs related to treatment was 1.3%. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported AEs, followed by musculoskeletal manifestations. The most frequent laboratory alteration observed was an increase in serum creatinine, which was significantly associated with hypertension, age, and mucosal involvement of leishmaniasis. No pregnancies were recorded during the implementation period. Early treatment discontinuation rate occurred in 11.8% of cases, with discontinuation associated with age and baseline serum creatinine alterations. Half of the patients required temporary treatment interruptions or irregular dosing, extending the treatment duration beyond the planned 28 days. This pharmacovigilance model provides valuable insights, representing an approach potentially applicable to other neglected disease control programs, especially when introducing new treatment technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.