Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671370›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Safety profile of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Laís Raquel Ribeiro, Sarah Nascimento Silva, Mell Ferreira Saliba, Janaína de Pina Carvalho, Gláucia Cota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Miltefosine implementation for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: access indicators in the state of Minas Gerais, 2021-2024.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laís Raquel RibeiroPesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sarah Nascimento SilvaPesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-9819
Mell Ferreira SalibaPesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Janaína de Pina CarvalhoPesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gláucia CotaPesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical disease that poses a significant public health challenge in Brazil and worldwide. Miltefosine, the only orally administered drug available for CL, was recently incorporated into Brazil's treatment protocols following recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) and revisions by national health authorities. While this represents an important advancement, miltefosine is associated with frequent gastrointestinal side effects and potential teratogenic risks, necessitating careful patient eligibility assessments and close clinical monitoring throughout treatment. Furthermore, the absence of national effectiveness data underscores the need for careful monitoring during large-scale implementation. This study, part of a broader implementation monitoring process, seeks to estimate the frequency, intensity, and seriousness of adverse events (AEs) associated with miltefosine. It also aims to identify factors linked to treatment discontinuation during the pilot phase of miltefosine distribution in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Descriptive analyses were performed to present measures of central tendency and dispersion for the variables. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was conducted to explore relationships between explanatory variables and outcomes of interest. Between 2021 and 2023, 77.1% of patients treated with miltefosine experienced at least one AE. The rate of serious AEs related to treatment was 1.3%. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported AEs, followed by musculoskeletal manifestations. The most frequent laboratory alteration observed was an increase in serum creatinine, which was significantly associated with hypertension, age, and mucosal involvement of leishmaniasis. No pregnancies were recorded during the implementation period. Early treatment discontinuation rate occurred in 11.8% of cases, with discontinuation associated with age and baseline serum creatinine alterations. Half of the patients required temporary treatment interruptions or irregular dosing, extending the treatment duration beyond the planned 28 days. This pharmacovigilance model provides valuable insights, representing an approach potentially applicable to other neglected disease control programs, especially when introducing new treatment technologies.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousPhosphorylcholineAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntiprotozoal AgentsmiltefosinePhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID39671370
PMCPMC11643273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.