Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671368›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A standard procedure for constructing a multi-level social vulnerability index using CLSA and SOS data as working examples.

Jasmine C Mah, Olga Theou, Mario Ulises Perez-Zepeda, Jodie L Penwarden, Judith Godin, Kenneth Rockwood, Melissa K Andrew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasmine C MahDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-4286
Olga TheouGeriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mario Ulises Perez-ZepedaResearch Department at Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Jodie L PenwardenGeriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Judith GodinGeriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-7268
Kenneth RockwoodDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Melissa K AndrewDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe construct of social vulnerability attempts to understand social circumstances not merely as a descriptor, but as a predictor of adverse health events. It can be measured by aggregating social deficits in a social vulnerability index (SVI). We describe a standard procedure for constructing a multi-level SVI using two working examples.

methodsFirst, we describe a six-step approach to constructing a SVI. Then, we conducted a secondary analysis of a clinical dataset (Canadian Immunization Research Network's Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network (SOS)) and a population-based dataset (Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)). In both datasets, we construct SVIs, use descriptive statistics to report distributions by age and sex, and perform a multivariable linear regression of social vulnerability on frailty.

resultsProcedures for drafting a list of candidate social items, selecting deficits for inclusion, and screening deficits to meet inclusion criteria were applied to yield a 18-deficit SVI for the SOS and 74-deficit SVI for the CLSA. Deficits in each SVI were re-scored between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates the greater risk. Finally, the sum of all deficits is calculated into an index. In the SOS, SVI was associated with age only for females and was weakly associated with frailty (r = 0.26, p<0.001). In the CLSA, SVI was associated with age for both sexes and moderately associated with frailty (r = 0.41, p<0.001).

conclusionWe present a standard method of constructing a SVI by incorporating factors from multiple social domains and levels in a social-ecological model. This SVI can be used to improve our understanding of social vulnerability and its impacts on the health of communities and individuals.

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCanadaFemaleFrailtyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39671368
PMCPMC11642991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.