Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671367›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Estimating the time of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza virus introduction into United States poultry flocks during the 2022/24 epizootic.

Amos Ssematimba, Sasidhar Malladi, Peter J Bonney, Kaitlyn M St Charles, Holden C Hutchinson, Melissa Schoenbaum, Rosemary Marusak, Marie R Culhane, Carol J Cardona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amos SsematimbaSecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5407-2478
Sasidhar MalladiU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Peter J BonneySecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kaitlyn M St CharlesSecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Holden C HutchinsonU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Melissa SchoenbaumU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Rosemary MarusakSecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Marie R CulhaneSecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-7576
Carol J CardonaSecure Food Systems Team, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following confirmation of the first case of the ongoing U.S. HPAI H5N1 epizootic in commercial poultry on February 8, 2022, the virus has continued to devastate the U.S. poultry sector and the pathogen has since managed to cross over to livestock and a few human cases have also been reported. Efficient outbreak management benefits greatly from timely detection and proper identification of the pathways of virus introduction and spread. In this study, we used changes in mortality rates as a proxy for HPAI incidence in a layer, broiler and turkey flock together with diagnostic test results to infer within-flock HPAI transmission dynamics. Mathematical modeling techniques, specifically the Approximate Bayesian Computation algorithm in conjunction with a stochastic within-flock HPAI transmission model were used in the analysis. The time window of HPAI virus introduction into the flock (TOI) and the adequate contact rate (ACR) were estimated. Then, using the estimated TOI together with the day when the first HPAI positive sample was collected from the flock, we calculated the most likely time to first positive sample (MTFPS) which reflects the time to HPAI detection. The estimated joint (i.e., all species combined) median of the MTFPS for different flocks was six days, the joint median most likely ACR was 6.8 newly infected birds per infectious bird per day, the joint median R0 was 13 and the joint median number of test days per flock was two. These results were also grouped by species and by epidemic phase and discussed accordingly. We conclude that this findings from this and other related studies are beneficial for the different stakeholders in outbreak management. We recommend that combining TOI analysis with complementary approaches such as phylogenetic analyses is critically important for improved understanding of disease transmission pathways. The estimated parameters can also be used to parametrize mathematical models that can guide the design of surveillance protocols, risk analyses of HPAI spread, and emergency preparedness for HPAI outbreaks.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInfluenza in BirdsPoultryAnimalsBayes TheoremChickensInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypePoultry DiseasesTime FactorsTurkeysUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39671367
PMCPMC11642945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.