ArticlePloS one2024
Use of integrative and complementary practices in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic posed an unprecedented challenge to global health. In the context of an overwhelmed healthcare system and the rising demand for alternative strategies to manage stress and anxiety, this study aims to investigate and analyze the use of Integrative and Complementary Practices (ICP) in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing their importance in promoting health and well-being. We conducted a cross-sectional study among n = 12,136 Brazilian adults predominantly female, white, under 40 years of age and with a predominantly higher education level between August 24 and December 16, 2020, to assess the use of ICP. An online questionnaire was applied, with questions validated in previous health surveys. The sampling method employed was 'virtual snowball,' post-stratification procedures were used to consider the Brazilian regions, gender, age group, and educational level. The reported prevalence of ICP use was 61.8%, with meditation (28.2%), Reiki (21.7%), herbal medicine (28.2%), and aromatherapy (16.5%) being the most utilized practices. ICPs were more frequently adopted by females, older age groups, individuals with health insurance, and those who practiced social distancing. Health promotion and well-being were the primary reasons for engaging in ICP. The high adherence to ICP during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil reflects the population's search for therapeutic alternatives focused on the well-being and mental health. The utilization of ICP indicates the need to integrate these practices into healthcare systems, considering their potential to complement conventional treatment, especially in times of crisis. Public health policies should recognize and facilitate access to such practices to reduce inequities and promote integrative health. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of ICP in a public health crisis, encouraging further investigation into the potential inclusion of these practices in the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.