ArticlePloS one2024
Effect of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on mechanical ventilation duration in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has gained popularity in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, the nationwide effect of HFNC on mechanical ventilation duration has not been studied.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (28 days to 17 years old) admitted to tertiary ICUs for respiratory support from 2012 to 2019 using the Korean National Health Insurance database. Pre-/post-HFNC periods were defined as the 12 months before and after the application of HFNC in any hospital, respectively, allowing a 6-month transition period. Mechanical ventilation duration and ventilator-free days during these two periods were compared using a multivariable regression model.
resultsUsing data from 46 hospitals, 4,705 and 4,864 respective pre-/post-HFNC period patients were evaluated. During the post-HFNC period, 14.8% of patients were treated by HFNC, and 67.1% were treated using invasive mechanical ventilation. In adjusted analysis, mechanical ventilation duration was reduced by 0.99 days (confidence interval [CI]: -1.86, -0.12). The duration was significantly reduced by 17.81 days (CI: -35.46, -0.16) among patients whose ventilation duration was longer than 28 days. In subgroup analysis, mechanical ventilation duration was reduced by 1.49 days (CI: -2.78, -0.19) in the overall surgical group and 6.71 days (CI: -11.71, - 1.71) in the neurologic subgroup. Ventilator-free days were increased only in the overall surgical group, by 0.31 days (CI: 0.01, 0.61).
conclusionsApplication of HFNC to PICU patients could reduce mechanical ventilation duration, especially in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilator support or in post-operative patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.