ArticlePloS one2024
Analyzing scRNA-seq data by CCP-assisted UMAP and tSNE.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of atherosclerosis biomarkers through metabolic signatures and immune microenvironment analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Automatic computational classification of bone marrow cells for B cell pediatric leukemia using UMAP.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Multiscale differential geometry learning of networks with applications to single-cell RNA sequencing data.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is widely used to reveal heterogeneity in cells, which has given us insights into cell-cell communication, cell differentiation, and differential gene expression. However, analyzing scRNA-seq data is a challenge due to sparsity and the large number of genes involved. Therefore, dimensionality reduction and feature selection are important for removing spurious signals and enhancing downstream analysis. Correlated clustering and projection (CCP) was recently introduced as an effective method for preprocessing scRNA-seq data. CCP utilizes gene-gene correlations to partition the genes and, based on the partition, employs cell-cell interactions to obtain super-genes. Because CCP is a data-domain approach that does not require matrix diagonalization, it can be used in many downstream machine learning tasks. In this work, we utilize CCP as an initialization tool for uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE). By using 21 publicly available datasets, we have found that CCP significantly improves UMAP and tSNE visualization and dramatically improve their accuracy. More specifically, CCP improves UMAP by 22% in ARI, 14% in NMI and 15% in ECM, and improves tSNE by 11% in ARI, 9% in NMI and 8% in ECM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.