Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671325›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous cefazolin as an alternative to intravenous administration.

Fionnuala Murray, Okhee Yoo, Samuel Brophy-Williams, Matthew Rawlins, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Edward Raby, Sam Salman, Laurens Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. When and How to Use Subcutaneous Antibiotics.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fionnuala MurrayDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-1351
Okhee YooWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Samuel Brophy-WilliamsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.
Matthew RawlinsDepartment of Pharmacy, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6525-1084
Steven C WallisUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-9854
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Edward RabyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-6188
Sam SalmanWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-6784
Laurens ManningDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-5351

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for a Centre of Research Excellence APP2007007Investigator Grant APP2009736Medical Research Future Fund Investigator Grant APP1197177Stan Perron Charitable Foundation 000990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous (SC) administration of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Cefazolin is widely used for skin and soft tissue infections and other complex infections by IV administration.

methodsIn this prospective, cross-over self-controlled study, a single dose of SC cefazolin was administered to 15 stable inpatients established on IV cefazolin as part of their management plan. The equivalent dose of cefazolin was diluted in 50 mL of normal saline via gravity feed over 30 min. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following both the SC and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were evaluated.

resultsSC cefazolin was well tolerated. The bioavailability of SC administration was 74.8% (95% CI 66.7%-81.7%). Slower absorption from SC tissue was associated with a BMI of ≥30. Lower peak, and higher trough concentrations were observed with SC administration. Although lower bioavailability was observed with SC administration, the PTA for unbound drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 90% of the time between doses was higher for SC compared with IV administration at MICs between 0.25 and 4 mg/L. Simulated SC doses of 3 g twice daily had similar PTA to standard IV dosing of 2 g three times daily. A simulated 6 g continuous 24 h infusion of SC cefazolin had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile.

conclusionSC cefazolin appears to be well tolerated, with an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared with IV administration. Either 3 g twice daily, or 6 g as a 24 h SC infusion could be considered for future evaluation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTandem Mass SpectrometryYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolin

Identifiers

PMID39671325
PMCPMC11787891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.