Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671306›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Cell-autonomous timing drives the vertebrate segmentation clock's wave pattern.

Laurel A Rohde, Arianne Bercowsky-Rama, Guillaume Valentin, Sundar Ram Naganathan, Ravi A Desai, Petr Strnad, Daniele Soroldoni, Andrew C Oates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cycles upon cycles-Temperature scaling of medaka development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolvability in vertebrate segmentation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oscillatory control of embryonic development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Cell state transitions: catch them if you can.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurel A Rohde *Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-9116
Arianne Bercowsky-Rama *Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-853X
Guillaume ValentinCenter of PhenoGenomics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-6282
Sundar Ram NaganathanInstitute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-8687
Ravi A DesaiDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-3351
Petr StrnadInstitute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-0385
Daniele SoroldoniInstitute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrew C OatesInstitute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-3978

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program LT000078/2016Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 10.35802/098025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic and sequential segmentation of the growing vertebrate body relies on the segmentation clock, a multi-cellular oscillating genetic network. The clock is visible as tissue-level kinematic waves of gene expression that travel through the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and arrest at the position of each forming segment. Here, we test how this hallmark wave pattern is driven by culturing single maturing PSM cells. We compare their cell-autonomous oscillatory and arrest dynamics to those we observe in the embryo at cellular resolution, finding similarity in the relative slowing of oscillations and arrest in concert with differentiation. This shows that cell-extrinsic signals are not required by the cells to instruct the developmental program underlying the wave pattern. We show that a cell-autonomous timing activity initiates during cell exit from the tailbud, then runs down in the anterior-ward cell flow in the PSM, thereby using elapsed time to provide positional information to the clock. Exogenous FGF lengthens the duration of the cell-intrinsic timer, indicating extrinsic factors in the embryo may regulate the segmentation clock via the timer. In sum, our work suggests that a noisy cell-autonomous, intrinsic timer drives the slowing and arrest of oscillations underlying the wave pattern, while extrinsic factors in the embryo tune this timer's duration and precision. This is a new insight into the balance of cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving tissue patterning in development.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBiological ClocksCell DifferentiationEmbryo, NonmammalianMesodermVertebratesZebrafishcell trackingdevelopmental biologyintrinsic timerprimary cell culturesegmentation clocksomitogenesiszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID39671306
PMCPMC11643631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.