Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671277›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Joint mirror procedure: controlling false discovery rate for identifying simultaneous signals.

Linsui Deng, Kejun He, Xianyang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linsui DengSchool of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Kejun HeCenter for Applied Statistics, Institute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-6246
Xianyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-1816

Funding

Methods for microbiome compositional dataR01GM144351 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jun Chen, Xianyang Zhang · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
Methods for Analysis of Genomic Data with Auxiliary InformationR21HG011662 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHEN, JUN, ZHANG, XIANYANG · 2021 to 2022
$434k
National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3304701NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG011662NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144351NIH HHS 1R01GM144351-01NSF DMS-2113359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many applications, the process of identifying a specific feature of interest often involves testing multiple hypotheses for their joint statistical significance. Examples include mediation analysis, which simultaneously examines the existence of the exposure-mediator and the mediator-outcome effects, and replicability analysis, aiming to identify simultaneous signals that exhibit statistical significance across multiple independent studies. In this work, we present a new approach called the joint mirror (JM) procedure that effectively detects such features while maintaining false discovery rate (FDR) control in finite samples. The JM procedure employs an iterative method that gradually shrinks the rejection region based on progressively revealed information until a conservative estimate of the false discovery proportion is below the target FDR level. Additionally, we introduce a more stringent error measure known as the composite FDR (cFDR), which assigns weights to each false discovery based on its number of null components. We use the leave-one-out technique to prove that the JM procedure controls the cFDR in finite samples. To implement the JM procedure, we propose an efficient algorithm that can incorporate partial ordering information. Through extensive simulations, we show that our procedure effectively controls the cFDR and enhances statistical power across various scenarios, including the case that test statistics are dependent across the features. Finally, we showcase the utility of our method by applying it to real-world mediation and replicability analyses.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationBiometryData Interpretation, StatisticalFalse Positive ReactionsHumansModels, Statisticalcomposite nullmediation analysismultiple hypothesis testingreplicability analysis

Identifiers

PMID39671277
PMCPMC11639532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.