Trial reportJAMA2025
Camrelizumab vs Placebo in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Early or Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The CamRelief Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04613674 (A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-controlled Phase Ⅲ Study to Evaluate Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Placebo Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Early or Locally Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-controlled Phase Ⅲ Study to Evaluate Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Placebo Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Early or Locally Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics associated with pathological complete response in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy for early-stage or locally -advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Association between the expression status of programmed cell death ligand 1 and the efficacy of pan-cancer neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib as a chemotherapy-free strategy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a phase II study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Trial
- Tumor flare-like response: A novel imaging phenomenon with predictive significance in triple negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Trial
- Effect of adjuvant carboplatin intensified chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy on survival in women with high risk, early stage, triple negative breast cancer (CITRINE): randomised, open label phase 3 trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Exploratory phase II trial of an anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab combined with a VEGFR-2 inhibitor apatinib and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (NeoPanDa03): efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Trial
- Pathological Complete Response to Nab-Paclitaxel-Containing Neoadjuvant Regimens in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring trop-2-directed ADCs monotherapy and combination therapy in pretreated mTNBC: a real-world study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence, clinical boundaries and emerging strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Beyond Molecular Classification in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Toward Subtype-Guided Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Expert Consensus on the Combined Application of Radiotherapy and Novel Systemic Agents in Breast Cancer Treatment.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting MORC2 activates transposable element-mediated viral mimicry and potentiates immune checkpoint blockade in triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Uncoupling tumor immunogenicity from cell death with platinum(IV)-antibody conjugates.National science review · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy and Breast Reconstruction: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting IL27RA Enhances Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Modulating Tumor Cells and the Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Preferred neoadjuvant strategies for early or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer include a 4-drug chemotherapy regimen containing anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, taxanes, and platinum. Blockade of the programmed death receptor 1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway may improve efficacy of classic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has showed antitumor activity in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with early or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial enrolled patients from 40 hospitals in China between November 25, 2020, and May 12, 2023 (data cutoff: September 30, 2023). A total of 441 eligible patients were enrolled. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either camrelizumab 200 mg (n = 222) or placebo (n = 219) combined with chemotherapy every 2 weeks. The chemotherapy included nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 1.5) on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles for the first 16 weeks followed by epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was pathological complete response (defined as no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes [ypT0/Tis ypN0]). Results: Among 441 females randomized (median age, 48 years), the median (range) follow-up duration from randomization was 14.4 (0.0-31.8) months. Pathological complete response was achieved in 126 patients (56.8% [95% CI, 50.0%-63.4%]) in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 98 patients (44.7% [95% CI, 38.0%-51.6%]) in the placebo-chemotherapy group (rate difference, 12.2% [95% CI, 3.3%-21.2%]; 1-sided P = .004). In the neoadjuvant phase, adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 198 patients (89.2%) in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 182 (83.1%) in the placebo-chemotherapy group; serious adverse events occurred in 77 patients (34.7%) in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 50 (22.8%) in the placebo-chemotherapy group, with fatal adverse events occurring in 2 patients (0.9%) in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with early or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer, the addition of camrelizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04613674.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.