ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
A Pattern-Based OCT Metric for Glaucoma Detection.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Larger Real-World OCT Reference Database Improves Accuracy of Glaucoma Flagging Using Summary Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Swept-source optical coherence tomography quantitative scoring system accurately predicts postoperative intraocular pressure control and visual outcomes in primary angle-closure glaucoma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model Detects Glaucoma Based on an OCT Report, but Where Should the Clinician Look to Identify Glaucomatous Damage?Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Outperforms Conventional Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and test a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) metric for the detection of glaucoma based on a logistic regression model (LRM) and known patterns of glaucomatous damage. Methods: The six variables of the LRM were based on characteristic patterns of damage seen on the OCT thickness maps of the ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL+) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Two cohorts were used to develop the LRM. The healthy cohort consisted of 400 individuals randomly selected from a real-world reference database (RW-RDB) of OCT widefield scans from 4932 eyes/individuals obtained from 10 optometry practices. The glaucoma cohort consisted of 207 individuals from the same 10 practices but with OCT reports with evidence of optic neuropathy consistent with glaucoma (ON-G). Specificity was assessed with 396 eyes/individuals from a commercial RDB. Sensitivity was assessed with individuals with ON-G from different optometry practices. Results: For the new LRM metric, the partial area under the reciever operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for specificity >90% was 0.92, and the sensitivity at 95% specificity was 88.8%. These values were significantly greater than those of a previously reported LRM metric (0.82 and 78.1%, respectively) and two common OCT thickness metrics: global circumpapillary RNFL (0.77 and 57.5%, respectively), and global GCL+IPL (0.72 and 47.6%, respectively). Conclusions: The new metric outperformed other OCT metrics for detecting glaucomatous damage. Translational Relevance: The new metric has the potential to improve the accuracy of referrals from primary care to specialist care via risk scores and calculators, as well as glaucoma definitions for clinical trials. The individual variables of this model may also aid clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.