Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671225›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

A Pattern-Based OCT Metric for Glaucoma Detection.

Donald C Hood, Sol La Bruna, Mary Durbin, Chris Lee, Anya Guzman, Tayna Gebhardt, Yujia Wang, Arin L Stowman, Carlos Gustavo De Moraes, Michael Chaglasian and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Donald C HoodBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sol La BrunaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mary DurbinTopcon Healthcare Inc., Oakland, NJ, USA.
Chris LeeTopcon Healthcare Inc., Oakland, NJ, USA.
Anya GuzmanTopcon Healthcare Inc., Oakland, NJ, USA.
Tayna GebhardtDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Yujia WangBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Arin L StowmanBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carlos Gustavo De MoraesBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael ChaglasianIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA.
Emmanouil TsamisBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Development, validation and assessment of an automated, topographic structure-function approach to the detection of glaucoma and its progressionR00EY032182 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Emmanouil Tsamis · 2024 to 2026
$745k
Development, validation and assessment of an automated, topographic structure-function approach to the detection of glaucoma and its progressionK99EY032182 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI TSAMIS, EMMANOUIL · 2021 to 2022
$261k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY032182NEI NIH HHS R00 EY032182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and test a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) metric for the detection of glaucoma based on a logistic regression model (LRM) and known patterns of glaucomatous damage. Methods: The six variables of the LRM were based on characteristic patterns of damage seen on the OCT thickness maps of the ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL+) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Two cohorts were used to develop the LRM. The healthy cohort consisted of 400 individuals randomly selected from a real-world reference database (RW-RDB) of OCT widefield scans from 4932 eyes/individuals obtained from 10 optometry practices. The glaucoma cohort consisted of 207 individuals from the same 10 practices but with OCT reports with evidence of optic neuropathy consistent with glaucoma (ON-G). Specificity was assessed with 396 eyes/individuals from a commercial RDB. Sensitivity was assessed with individuals with ON-G from different optometry practices. Results: For the new LRM metric, the partial area under the reciever operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for specificity >90% was 0.92, and the sensitivity at 95% specificity was 88.8%. These values were significantly greater than those of a previously reported LRM metric (0.82 and 78.1%, respectively) and two common OCT thickness metrics: global circumpapillary RNFL (0.77 and 57.5%, respectively), and global GCL+IPL (0.72 and 47.6%, respectively). Conclusions: The new metric outperformed other OCT metrics for detecting glaucomatous damage. Translational Relevance: The new metric has the potential to improve the accuracy of referrals from primary care to specialist care via risk scores and calculators, as well as glaucoma definitions for clinical trials. The individual variables of this model may also aid clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

GlaucomaNerve FibersTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedRetinal Ganglion CellsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID39671225
PMCPMC11645750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.